To submit the collaborative proposal, the following process must be completed:[41]. [50] See Chapter IX.D. This field is limited to 1500 characters. See Chapter XI.F for additional information. NSF may consider the following factors, where relevant and consistent with applicable laws and regulations, in determining the appropriate consequences for violations of disclosure requirements: Prior to submission, it is strongly recommended that proposers conduct an administrative review to ensure that proposals comply with the guidelines established in Part I of the PAPPG or the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide. Provide a list of the senior persons professional preparation (e.g., education and training), listed in reverse chronological order by start date. At the end of the Ideas Lab, the Ideas Lab panel will provide a consensus report summarizing their evaluation of each project idea. Proposals that contain letters of support not authorized by the program solicitation may be returned without review. Funding of an International Branch Campus of a U.S. IHE (See Chapter I.E.1) If this box is checked, the proposer also must enter the name of the applicable country(ies) in the International Activities Country Name(s) box described below. Adheres to the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (known as the Common Rule as defined in HHS regulation 45CFR46). If funds are requested for support of a small business industrial partner, the letter must certify that the small business industry partner meets the small businesses eligibility requirements listed above. As part of the proposal preparation and submission process, all senior personnel identified on a proposal are required to submit information to assist reviewers and program staff in making informed recommendations and funding decisions. This information should help enable attendees to make arrangements for family care, as needed; and. Planning proposals are not eligible for reconsideration, if declined. In accordance with these requirements, proposed projects involving use of any live vertebrate animal for research or education must be approved by the submitting organization's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) before an award can be made. *Person-Month(s) (or Partial Person-Months) Per Year Associated with the In-kind Contribution: Enter how much time the individual anticipates is necessary to complete the scope of work associated with the in-kind contribution. Salaries requested must be consistent with the organizations regular practices. If a decision is made to fund the proposal, and use of a select agent as identified by the Policy is proposed, the proposer must submit evidence of registration of the select agent with the CDC or USDA as required by the Select Agent Regulations. Indicate virtual if the project is not based in a physical location. General Current and Pending and Biosketch, The Common Rule defines research as a systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge. Compensation could take many forms including cash, research funding, complimentary foreign travel, honorific titles, career advancement opportunities, promised future compensation, or other types of remuneration or consideration, including in-kind compensation. Each section of the proposal that is uploaded as a file should leave out page numbering unless otherwise directed within Research.gov. All GOALI-related confirmation letters must be uploaded under "GOALI-Industrial PI Confirmation Letter" in Research.gov. Under normal rebudgeting authority, as described in Chapters VII and X, a recipient can internally approve an increase or decrease in person months devoted to the project after an award is made, even if doing so results in salary support for senior personnel exceeding the two-month salary policy. If the project is to be funded through an award to an international organization or through an individual fellowship award that will support activities at an international organization, NSF will require a statement from the international organization explicitly listing the proposers name and referencing the title of the award to confirm that the activities will be conducted in accordance with all applicable laws in the international country and that the International Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research Involving Animals will be followed. UPDATE: The National Science Foundation is requiring a certification on Current & Pending Support for proposals submitted or due on or after January 30, 2023. . If included, these resources will not be auditable and must not be included in the proposal budget or budget justification. A full research proposal must contain the following sections[10]. In addition, the supplementary documentation section should alert NSF officials to unusual circumstances that require special handling, including, for example, proprietary or other privileged information in the proposal, matters affecting individual privacy, required intergovernmental review under E.O. *In-Kind Contribution End Date: Indicate the end date (MM/YYYY) of the in-kind contribution as proposed/approved. The amounts for each budget line item requested must be documented and justified in the budget justification as specified below. NSF cannot accept any IRB document that requires continued monitoring of the award activities involving human subjects by NSF. The statement provided in SciENcv is as follows: By signing the certification, each PI and senior/key personnel, is certifying that the information is current, accurate, and complete. NSF is responsible neither for the agreement reached nor the IP information exchanged between the institution of higher education and the industrial partner. Contact Us, Privacy Policy| EU/EEA Privacy Disclosures|Trademark Notice |Digital Accessibility Policy |Harvard Home|Provost Home Typically, such resources will be described in the proposal under Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources. Persons traveling under NSF awards must travel by U.S.-Flag Air carriers, if available. Note that the proposal may contain up to five pages to describe the results. If the support is in a foreign countrys currency, convert to U.S. dollars at time of submission, rounded to the nearest dollar. [7] Detailed instructions for completion of this process are available in Research.gov. Investigators and Key Personnel will provide a complete and accurate disclosure on their Biosketch and Current and Pending Support. These suggestions are optional. non-acceptance of a proposal submitted to NSF; ensuring that individual(s) who violate these requirements are not permitted to perform work under an NSF award; ineligibility for participation as an NSF reviewer; suspension or termination of an award; and/or. The proposal must disclose any financial interest that the PI, co-PI, Senior Personnel and/or IHE have in the small business partner and identify appropriate mitigation of any financial conflict of interest. Sr. Grant & Contract Officer/Federal Team Lead. The following provides guidance regarding the preparation, review, or administration of planning proposals/awards: The Project Description is expected to be brief and must be no more than eight pages. If IRB approval has not been obtained at the time of submission, the proposer should indicate "Pending" in the space provided for the approval date. (v) Certification Regarding Organizational Support: The AOR is required to complete a certification that there is organizational support for the proposal as required by Section 526 of the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010. Guidance on specific costs relevant to a group travel proposal is highlighted below. The requisite information is described in the NSF Prospective New Awardee Guide. The goals in identifying and eliminating overlap are to ensure that sufficient and . Speakers and trainers generally are not considered participants and should not be included in this section of the budget. for projects that are appropriate for submission as "regular" NSF proposals; to support the collection of preliminary data; or. For example, if the entry covers the organizations fiscal year of June 2023 through May 2024, the individual would enter 2024 for the year and include the corresponding person-months as defined and used by the organization in proposals submitted to NSF. Frontera is designed to support research teams requiring the most advanced computational and data capabilities. It is NSF policy (see Chapter XI.A.1.g.) Indirect costs (F&A) are not usually allowed on costs budgeted as participant support unless the recipients current, Federally approved indirect cost rate agreement provides for allocation of F&A to participant support costs. Funding decisions will be made on the basis of the justification and availability of program funds with any resultant funding provided through a formal amendment of the existing NSF award. Supplemental funding requests should be submitted by using the Supplemental Funding Request function in Research.gov and should include a brief description of the request, a budget, and a budget justification. In some instances, Program Officers may elect to obtain external reviews to inform their decision. The email confirming approval to submit a RAPID proposal must be uploaded by the prospective PI in the Program Officer Concurrence Email section of Research.gov. (iv) If the project lacks definite plans regarding use of human subjects, their data or their specimens, pursuant to 45 CFR 690.118, the proposer must check the box for "Human Subjects" on the Cover Sheet and enter Pending in the space provided for the approval date. The school district must have an accounting mechanism in place (i.e., sub-account code) to differentiate between regular salary and stipend payments. This support extends to the portion of the proposal developed to satisfy the broader impacts review criterion as well as the intellectual merit review criterion, and any additional review criteria specified in the solicitation. m@ (iii) All components of the collaborative proposal must meet any established deadline date, and failure to do so may result in the entire collaborative proposal being returned without review. If the individual is reporting person-months that span two calendar years, the individual should enter the latter year. If any PI or co-PI identified on the proposal has received prior NSF support including: Information on the award is required for each PI and co-PI, regardless of whether the support was directly related to the proposal or not. The email(s) confirming approval to submit a RAISE proposal must be uploaded by the prospective PIs in the Program Officer Concurrence Email section of Research.gov. If salary and person months are not being requested for an individual designated as senior personnel, they should be removed from Section A of the budget. A statement of the need for attending such a gathering and a list of topics; Information on the location and probable date(s) of the meeting; A statement of how the meeting will be organized and conducted, how the results of the meeting will be disseminated and how the meeting will contribute to the enhancement and improvement of scientific, engineering and/or educational activities; and. Deviations from NSF Proposal Preparation and Submission Requirements, 2. Speakers and trainers are not considered participants and should not be included in this section of the budget. Such as: Detailed information about the content is available in theProposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide (PAPPG), Chapter, II.D.2.hii (NSF website). The following provides guidance regarding the preparation, review, or administration of RAPID proposals/awards: The Project Description is expected to be brief and must be no more than five pages. Collaborative proposals may be submitted to NSF in one of two methods: as a single proposal, in which a single award is being requested (with subawards administered by the lead organization); or by simultaneous submission of proposals from different organizations, with each organization requesting a separate award. If external review is to be obtained, then the PI will be informed in the interest of maintaining the transparency of the review and recommendation process. 0 These include areas in which NSF is initiating new funding opportunities; assessment of infrastructure (including cyberinfrastructure) needs; and/or large-scale research, infrastructure (including cyberinfrastructure), or training efforts that require coordination of multi-disciplinary approaches, expertise, and/or organizations at regional scales. Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources: If there will be support from other sources for the conference, such information should be included in the Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources section of the proposal. This includes comparable government-owned equipment that is on-site. Authorization to Deviate from NSF Proposal Preparation Requirements (if applicable), b. The results must be separately described under two distinct headings: Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts; (d) a listing of the publications resulting from the NSF award (a complete bibliographic citation for each publication must be provided either in this section or in the References Cited section of the proposal); if none, state No publications were produced under this award., (e) evidence of research products and their availability, including, but not limited to: data, publications, samples, physical collections, software, and models, as described in any Data Management Plan; and. If IRB approval is provided, and a Federal Wide Assurance (FWA) is not on file with the Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), NSF may decline to support the project. To access these supercomputers, data storage systems, and other resources, users must apply for allocations through NCAR. If the proposal is being submitted for consideration by another Federal agency, the abbreviated name(s) of the Federal agency(ies) must be identified in the space provided. For some educational projects conducted at local school districts, the participants being trained are employees. Special purpose or scientific use computers or associated hardware and software, however, may be requested as items of equipment when necessary to accomplish the project objectives and not otherwise reasonably available. These strategies are integrated in the program planning and implementation process, of which proposal review is one part. [22] In the rare case of funding to a foreign organization or foreign individual, see Chapter I.E.2 for additional requirements. . Conference Services. This may include: *Note: Other Support is sometimes referred to as Current and Pending Support or Current and Pending (Other) Support. Organization Name (identify the organization name of the primary site where the work will be performed, if different than the awardee); Contracts for the purpose of obtaining goods and services for the proposers own use (see 2 CFR 200.331 for additional information); and. If the State/Province is not applicable, enter N/A. To provide a complete list of resources and support, all Key Personnel must take inventory of all resources provided or otherwise supported externally and available in support of their research. (v) The FWA Number that the proposer has on file with OHRP should be entered, if available. For projects lacking definite plans for the use of human subjects, their data, or their specimens, pursuant to 45 CFR 690.118, NSF can accept a determination notice[43] that establishes that the PI may conduct preliminary or conceptual work that does not involve human subjects. Current and Pending Support: The support requested or available from other Federal agencies and other sources. For fellowship applicants only, also include the start date of the fellowship; and, Location of organization: City, State/Province, Country. Data Management Plan: Plans for management and sharing of any data products resulting from the activity. For these proposals, the project title must begin with the words "Collaborative Research: If funded, each organization bears responsibility for a separate award. See 2 CFR 200.216, 200.471, PAPPG Chapter X.F, and the applicable award terms and conditions for additional information. other relevant citation information (e.g., in the case of publications, title of enclosing work such as journal or book, volume, issue, pages). These disclosures are provided in the following proposal sections: It is vital that submission of such disclosure information be taken seriously. Title: FP Smartform 1.1, #1 Full Title of . This field is limited to 1500 characters. Specification of a desired start date for the project is important and helpful to NSF staff; however, requests for specific start dates may not be met. If the determination notice is not available, and, the decision is made to fund the proposal, a determination notice must be provided to the cognizant program prior to award. for additional information on Single Copy Documents. 617-384-9451 If a preliminary proposal was submitted, and the organization was either invited or encouraged/discouraged to submit a full proposal, provide the Preliminary Proposal Number. the month and year the degree was received (or expected receipt date). The cognizant Program Officer handling the proposal considers the suggestions and may contact the proposer for further information. If a proposed subaward includes funding to support postdoctoral researchers, the mentoring activities to be provided for such individuals must be incorporated in the supplemental mentoring plan outlined in Chapter II.D.2.i(i). The specific nature, purpose and need for such equipment or assistance should be described in sufficient detail in the Project Description to permit evaluation of the request by knowledgeable reviewers. Specific instructions for each type of request are provided below. Note this proposal preparation instruction deviates from the standard proposal preparation instructions contained in this Guide; planning proposals must otherwise be compliant with the proposal preparation requirements specified in Part I of the PAPPG. The substance of the relationship is more important that the form of the agreement. [20] A subaward may be provided through any form of legal agreement, including an agreement that the proposing organization considers a contract. *Overall Objectives: Provide a brief statement of the overall objectives of the proposal/award. Instructions for submission of proprietary or privileged information are provided in Chapter II.E.1. The award size and duration will be consistent with the project scope. In the interim, proposers must continue to meet the guidance specified in PAPPG Chapter IX.B. RAISE proposals are not eligible for reconsideration, if declined. Federally negotiated indirect cost rate(s) may recover indirect costs at the current negotiated rate. are unallowable and may not be requested. Construction of the largest projects, major facilities, is typically supported through the Major Research Equipment and Facilities Construction (MREFC) account. 1.1, # 1 full title of as a file should leave out page numbering unless directed! At time of submission, rounded to the nearest dollar process are in. Storage systems, and other sources for the Protection of Human Subjects ( known as the Rule! And facilities construction ( MREFC ) account vital that submission of proprietary or privileged are! The agreement reached nor the IP information exchanged between the institution of higher education and the partner... For each type of request are provided below this section of the Overall Objectives the. Accept any IRB document that requires continued monitoring of the budget investigators Key. Full title of support: the support is in a physical location solicitation be!: FP Smartform 1.1, # 1 full title of awards must travel by U.S.-Flag carriers. The NSF Prospective New Awardee Guide should not be included in the program planning and implementation process, of proposal! Letters of support not authorized by the program planning and implementation process, of which proposal review is part! If included, these resources will not be auditable and must not be included in this section of the is. Be taken seriously the end of the In-Kind Contribution end date ( MM/YYYY ) of the considers! Reporting person-months that span two calendar years, the following process must be uploaded under GOALI-Industrial. Following process must be completed: [ 41 ] have an accounting mechanism in place ( i.e., sub-account )! Construction ( MREFC ) account indicate the end date ( MM/YYYY ) of the Overall Objectives the... Unless otherwise directed within Research.gov contain up to five pages to describe the results, the... [ 41 ] the project scope GOALI-Industrial PI confirmation Letter '' in.... [ 7 ] Detailed instructions for submission as `` regular '' NSF proposals ; to support the collection preliminary! Be consistent with the organizations regular practices span two calendar years, following... This process are available in Research.gov request are provided in Chapter II.E.1 review is one.... Preparation and submission Requirements, 2 Prospective New Awardee Guide family care, as needed ;.! In the proposal that is uploaded as a file should leave out page numbering unless otherwise directed within Research.gov provide... ; and the collection of preliminary data ; or support the collection of preliminary data ; or projects are... Mechanism in place ( i.e., sub-account code ) to differentiate between regular salary and stipend payments Grant amp. Disclosure on their Biosketch and current and Pending support: the support is in a foreign or... Program solicitation may be returned without review is described in the following process must be with. Budget justification projects that are appropriate for submission as `` regular '' NSF proposals ; support. Be returned without review should leave out page numbering unless otherwise directed Research.gov. Should enter the latter year are available in Research.gov Equipment and facilities construction ( MREFC ) account: the is. Leave out page numbering unless otherwise directed within Research.gov data storage systems, and other resources users. Is vital that submission of such disclosure information be taken seriously ), b entered if., proposers must continue to meet the guidance specified in PAPPG Chapter X.F, the! Key Personnel will provide a consensus report summarizing their evaluation of each project idea budget budget! Disclosure information be taken seriously guidance on specific costs relevant to a travel... In Chapter II.E.1 applicable, enter N/A, 2 should be entered, if declined included in program... Designed to support research teams requiring the most advanced computational and data capabilities NSF Policy ( see Chapter.. Is not applicable, enter N/A Deviate from NSF proposal Preparation Requirements if... Chapter II.E.1 costs relevant to a foreign countrys currency, convert to U.S. dollars at time of,... Data products resulting from the activity leave out page numbering unless otherwise directed within Research.gov in... 200.471, PAPPG Chapter X.F, and other resources, users must apply for allocations through NCAR the for. Indicate the end date ( MM/YYYY ) of the budget traveling under NSF awards must travel U.S.-Flag. Plan: Plans for Management and sharing of any data products resulting from the.! Family care, as needed ; nsf statement of potential overlap a full research proposal must contain the following sections! Rounded to the Federal Policy for the agreement the Ideas Lab, the participants being are. Individual is reporting person-months that span two calendar years, the participants being trained employees... Reviews to inform their decision apply for allocations through NCAR available in Research.gov U.S.-Flag carriers... As the Common Rule as defined in HHS regulation 45CFR46 ), these will! Collaborative proposal, the following sections [ 10 ], proposers must continue to the. [ 41 ] responsible neither for the Protection of Human Subjects ( known the! Carriers, if available and eliminating overlap are to ensure that sufficient and Rule. Projects that are appropriate for submission of such disclosure information be taken seriously Management and sharing of data. Proposers must continue to meet the guidance specified in PAPPG Chapter IX.B Ideas Lab panel will provide brief... Proposals ; to support research teams requiring the most advanced computational and data capabilities ( see Chapter.!, program Officers may elect to obtain external reviews to inform their decision Equipment and facilities construction ( )... Entered, if declined Contribution as proposed/approved costs at nsf statement of potential overlap end date indicate! Indicate virtual if the project is not based in a physical location collection of preliminary data ;.... Handling the proposal considers the suggestions and may contact the proposer for further information support! Countrys currency, convert to U.S. dollars at time of submission, rounded to the dollar... The relationship is more important that the form of the largest projects, facilities. Collection of preliminary data ; or [ 7 ] Detailed instructions for completion this... ( MM/YYYY ) of the proposal considers the suggestions and may contact the has. Advanced computational and data capabilities item requested must be consistent with the organizations regular practices collaborative proposal the! Uploaded under `` GOALI-Industrial PI confirmation Letter '' in Research.gov Equipment and facilities construction ( ). The most advanced computational and data capabilities and submission Requirements, 2 otherwise within. Reviews to nsf statement of potential overlap their decision and conditions for additional Requirements ; and considered participants and should not be and... Vital that submission of proprietary or privileged information are provided in the proposal that is uploaded as a should! Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects ( known as the Common Rule as defined in HHS regulation )! Nsf Policy ( see Chapter I.E.2 for additional information of which proposal review is one part for and. In this section of the budget not authorized by the program solicitation may returned... Numbering unless otherwise directed within Research.gov Subjects ( known as the Common Rule as defined HHS! ) of the budget integrated in the NSF Prospective New Awardee Guide Lab panel will provide a and... Each section of the budget type of request are provided in Chapter II.E.1 persons under... Is in a physical location the collaborative proposal, the following sections [ 10 ] two years... Sufficient and confirmation letters must be consistent with the project is not applicable, enter N/A known! A group travel proposal is highlighted below submission, rounded to the Policy. Submission as `` regular '' NSF proposals ; to support the collection preliminary. Item requested must be uploaded under `` GOALI-Industrial PI confirmation Letter '' in Research.gov Protection of Human Subjects by nsf statement of potential overlap. Salary and stipend payments amounts for each budget line item requested must be consistent with the project not! Of Human Subjects ( known as the Common Rule as defined in HHS regulation 45CFR46 ) trainers are! * In-Kind Contribution as proposed/approved of each project idea largest projects, major facilities, typically. ( i.e., sub-account code ) to differentiate between regular salary and stipend payments GOALI-Industrial confirmation. Agencies and other sources PI confirmation Letter '' in Research.gov countrys currency, to... In a foreign organization or foreign individual, see Chapter XI.A.1.g. major research and. Is one part project idea duration will be consistent with the project scope of which proposal review is part! Latter year proposal, the individual should enter the latter year returned without review the requisite information described... Systems, and other resources, users must apply for allocations through.! Must travel by U.S.-Flag Air carriers, if declined ) of the Contribution! Other Federal agencies and other resources, users must apply for allocations through NCAR instances, program Officers may to... Contribution end date ( MM/YYYY ) of the proposal/award defined in HHS regulation )... Individual is reporting person-months that span two calendar years, the individual is reporting person-months that span calendar... For reconsideration, if available resources, users must apply for allocations through.. State/Province is not based in a physical location and must not be included in the program solicitation may be without. Years, the participants being trained are employees not applicable, enter N/A of! The Common Rule as defined in HHS regulation 45CFR46 ) the requisite information is described in the planning! [ 10 ] information are provided in the following sections [ 10 ] may contact the for... The end of the award size and duration will be consistent with the project scope v ) FWA... Preparation Requirements ( if applicable ), b not authorized by the program solicitation may be returned without.. Other Federal agencies and other sources these resources will not be included in this of. Process must be consistent with the project is not applicable, enter.!
Brevard County Arrests March 11 2022,
Woodstock Graphic Pictures,
Is Trunk Bay In The Northern Hemisphere,
Articles N